Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2-BOARD

Two additional units for behavioral health needs

What should residents consider about Finding F2-BOARD: Two additional units for behavioral health needs, and the County’s response?

Madera County Board of Supervisors; Madera County SheriffAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

The board explicitly agrees with Finding 2.

Audit analysis

The board reproduces and accepts the construction finding without adding evidence in the finding response. Expansion detail appears separately in its response to R2 on the following PDF page.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

PDF page 3 explicitly agrees with the full F2 finding. No explanation is required for agreement, but this finding response offers neither a construction rationale nor a supporting project record. Detail supplied to R2 on page 4 is not credited to this F2 score.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is