Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F11.7

F11.7: The CRDF has a modified version of the FIP program.

What should residents consider about Finding F11.7: F11.7: The CRDF has a modified version of the FIP program., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County accepts program differences but disputes inferior CRDF services, citing April 2026 adoption of TTCF training, January 2025 GOGI instruction, and planned Peer Certification curriculum.

Audit analysis

Explicit partial disagreement identifies accepted differences and disputed effectiveness, with concrete dated training changes as rationale and checkable bases. Training changes do not independently demonstrate equal outcomes; future curriculum is not completed accreditation. Report physical PDF page(s) 467; County response physical PDF page(s) 63. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Explicit partial disagreement identifies accepted differences and disputed effectiveness, with concrete dated training changes as rationale and checkable bases. Training changes do not independently demonstrate equal outcomes; future curriculum is not completed accreditation.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is