Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F11.6

F11.6: Sheriff deputies are rotated into the Twin Towers mental health issues section as part of their duty tours.

What should residents consider about Finding F11.6: F11.6: Sheriff deputies are rotated into the Twin Towers mental health issues section as part of their duty tours., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County partially disagrees, explaining mandatory rotations and specialized training, without directly resolving the jury's claim that some deputies do not understand or support FIP.

Audit analysis

Position explicit and rotation/training rationale concrete, but policies and courses do not fully explain disagreement with observed disinterest or nonsupport. CDM 3-01/020.05, Rosas Provision 18.1, and named training provide checkable support for the mechanisms described, not staff attitudes. Report physical PDF page(s) 467; County response physical PDF page(s) 62–63. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Position explicit and rotation/training rationale concrete, but policies and courses do not fully explain disagreement with observed disinterest or nonsupport. CDM 3-01/020.05, Rosas Provision 18.1, and named training provide checkable support for the mechanisms described, not staff attitudes.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is