Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F11.2

F11.2: CHS needs more staff to assist in the ongoing needs of inmates with mental health issues at TTCF and CDRF.

What should residents consider about Finding F11.2: F11.2: CHS needs more staff to assist in the ongoing needs of inmates with mental health issues at TTCF and CDRF., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County disputes insufficient staffing at TTCF and CRDF, citing the federal settlement monitor, staffing adequacy, a typical 20 percent vacancy rate, and a 20 percent retention bonus while acknowledging recruitment challenges.

Audit analysis

Partial disagreement identifies adequacy as disputed and explains it for both facilities while acknowledging challenges. Named United States v. County settlement monitoring supplies a checkable basis; comparative staffing and percentage claims are not independently verified. Report physical PDF page(s) 466; County response physical PDF page(s) 60–61. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Partial disagreement identifies adequacy as disputed and explains it for both facilities while acknowledging challenges. Named United States v. County settlement monitoring supplies a checkable basis; comparative staffing and percentage claims are not independently verified.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is