Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F11.1

F11.1: The FIP Program has been managed up to now by its MHA inmate founders, together with Correctional Health Services and sheriff staff.

What should residents consider about Finding F11.1: F11.1: The FIP Program has been managed up to now by its MHA inmate founders, together with Correctional Health Services and sheriff staff., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County disputes weakened leadership, describing shared LASD/CHS/MHA management and recruitment and training of replacements; it identifies CHS as part of DHS, not DMH.

Audit analysis

Whole disagreement and reasons clearly address management, MHA departures, continuity, and alleged weakness. Specific replacement and shared-management assertions lack an identified supporting record; absence of observed weakness remains County's claim. Report physical PDF page(s) 466; County response physical PDF page(s) 60. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

Whole disagreement and reasons clearly address management, MHA departures, continuity, and alleged weakness. Specific replacement and shared-management assertions lack an identified supporting record; absence of observed weakness remains County's claim.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is