Response says
County agrees security measures improved and cites funding acquired for cameras covering bin, cage, and vault areas, with work ongoing. It does not clearly explain which remaining security concern it disputes.
What should residents consider about Finding F3.5: F3.5: The LACO ME’s office has taken several key measures to tighten the safeguards of decedent personal property., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County agrees security measures improved and cites funding acquired for cameras covering bin, cage, and vault areas, with work ongoing. It does not clearly explain which remaining security concern it disputes.
Audit analysis
Explicit partial disagreement addresses improvements and remaining-area safeguards, but ongoing camera work leaves the disputed portion and reason for rejecting present concerns incomplete. Funding and work assertions lack an identified record. Report physical PDF page(s) 171; County response physical PDF page(s) 40. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
4/6
Public usefulness
Explicit partial disagreement addresses improvements and remaining-area safeguards, but ongoing camera work leaves the disputed portion and reason for rejecting present concerns incomplete. Funding and work assertions lack an identified record.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.