Response says
County disputes that necessary repairs delay the feasibility study, stating repairs and study proceed on parallel tracks.
What should residents consider about Finding F3.4: F3.4: Currently the LACO CEO is working on necessary repairs to the existing building, delaying the feasibility study regarding new facilities that have been authorized by the Board of Supervisors., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County disputes that necessary repairs delay the feasibility study, stating repairs and study proceed on parallel tracks.
Audit analysis
Partial disagreement clearly isolates and explains the disputed causal proposition while acknowledging repairs. Parallel work is a finding-specific explanation, but no schedule or other supporting record is identified. Report physical PDF page(s) 170; County response physical PDF page(s) 40. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Partial disagreement clearly isolates and explains the disputed causal proposition while acknowledging repairs. Parallel work is a finding-specific explanation, but no schedule or other supporting record is identified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.