Response says
County expressly gives no substantive response to the LA Metro oversight finding because Metro is an independent transportation authority, not a County department.
What should residents consider about Finding F9.11: F9.11: LA Metro plans to establish a civilian oversight committee when it launches its new in-house transit police force but has not yet established that oversight body., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County expressly gives no substantive response to the LA Metro oversight finding because Metro is an independent transportation authority, not a County department.
Audit analysis
No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly identifies and explains the institutional exclusion. Reference to establishment under State law does not identify a particular law. Not evidence of Metro nonresponse. Report physical PDF page(s) 386; County response physical PDF page(s) 55. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
0/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly identifies and explains the institutional exclusion. Reference to establishment under State law does not identify a particular law. Not evidence of Metro nonresponse.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.