Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F9.10

F9.10: The South Gate Police Department has no civilian oversight commission and handles compliance through its Internal Administration Division, resulting in less involvement by civilians in SGPD technology oversight.

What should residents consider about Finding F9.10: F9.10: The South Gate Police Department has no civilian oversight commission and handles compliance through its Internal Administration Division, resulting in less involvement by civilians in SGPD technology oversight., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Not addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County expressly gives no substantive response to the South Gate civilian-oversight finding because it concerns City of South Gate operations.

Audit analysis

No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly bounds its response and explains the jurisdictional exclusion with a specific municipal attribution, without citing authority. Not evidence of City nonresponse. Report physical PDF page(s) 386; County response physical PDF page(s) 55. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

5/10

0/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
0/2
Applicable disagreement elements
0/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly bounds its response and explains the jurisdictional exclusion with a specific municipal attribution, without citing authority. Not evidence of City nonresponse.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is