Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R1.10

Recommendation R1.10

LASD should consider offering signing bonuses, as it also monitors other benefits offered by competing law enforcement agencies.

Jury report: The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department: Changing Culture and Increasing Transparency · PDF page 89

Permanent link

Official response

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)

Agency says further analysis needed

Says bonuses were considered and incentives implemented where possible, citing cost, uncertain effectiveness and morale concerns. Additional cost-benefit analysis is required; no signing bonus or implementation date is adopted.

Read official response · PDF page 15

Editorial engagement review of the answer, not confirmation of implementation. Says bonuses were considered and incentives implemented where possible, citing cost, uncertain effectiveness and morale concerns. Additional cost-benefit analysis is required; no signing bonus or implementation date is adopted. Report physical PDF page(s) 89; County response physical PDF page(s) 15. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

  • LASD calls for additional cost-benefit analysis of recruitment incentives, without adopting a signing bonus. Owner: Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response). Timing: Not specified.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions