Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R3.1

Recommendation R3.1

The Board of Supervisors should continue to express its support for acquiring and maintaining national accreditation of the ME’s office and budget for additional pathology staff to effectively and efficiently process an increasing number of cases.

Jury report: Our Medical Examiner’s Challenge: Providing State-of-the-Art Services in a Confined, Aging Facility · PDF page 172

Permanent link

Official response

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)

Agency says implemented

County agrees and reports implementation, citing the September 30, 2025 five-vote Board motion supporting NAME accreditation, staffing, and efficient processes. This is the respondent's implementation claim, not verification of staffing sufficiency.

Read official response · PDF page 41

Editorial engagement review of the answer, not confirmation of implementation. County agrees and reports implementation, citing the September 30, 2025 five-vote Board motion supporting NAME accreditation, staffing, and efficient processes. This is the respondent's implementation claim, not verification of staffing sufficiency. Report physical PDF page(s) 172; County response physical PDF page(s) 41. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions