Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R2.3.2

Recommendation R2.3.2

To verify the accuracy of allegations in potentially fraudulent class action lawsuits and the validity of mass settlement claims: The credibility checklist should be shared with law enforcement agencies when fraud is evident.

Jury report: Los Angeles County Foster Care · PDF page 137

Permanent link

Official response

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)

Agency says further analysis needed

For the shared claim-validity objective, County agrees but defers checklist sharing to further analysis in the next six months and beyond by County/DCFS legal teams and DA, citing sensitivity and confidentiality. Response does not claim a checklist exists or has been shared.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Editorial engagement review of the answer, not confirmation of implementation. For the shared claim-validity objective, County agrees but defers checklist sharing to further analysis in the next six months and beyond by County/DCFS legal teams and DA, citing sensitivity and confidentiality. Response does not claim a checklist exists or has been shared. Report physical PDF page(s) 137; County response physical PDF page(s) 25–26. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

  • County/DCFS legal teams and DA would further analyze checklist information sharing because of sensitivity and confidentiality; no unconditional sharing promise. Owner: Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response). Timing: in the next six months and beyond.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions