Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F3

Finding F3

After a review of documents, it is our opinion that the general contractor responsible for phase 3 did not and has not met his contractural obligation. Reviewing the punch list, we see that the general contractor did not provide proper site supervision. Further more, it is our opinion that the lawsuit filed by the contractor against Lassen County is just a tactic to postpone the County’s ability to use the Contractor’s Required Performance Bond to complete the project.

Jury report: Lassen County Historical Court House Modernization Project Inquiry · PDF page 15

Permanent link

Official responses

No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.
Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions