California Civil Grand Jury reports
Imperial County Civil Grand Jury
Read findings and recommendations from Imperial County Civil Grand Jury reports, compare recorded agency responses, and explore the questions they raise.
- Report cycles
- 1 report cycles
- Official reports
- 4 official reports
- Civic questions
- 6 civic questions
Latest cycle
2025–2026 findings and responses
Read the latest published cycle’s findings and recommendations, follow recorded agency responses, and explore public discussion.
Imperial County · 2025–2026
6 civic questions · 4 official reports
Issue area
Prison staffing and controlled access
What would make prison staffing priorities and access controls understandable?
2 questions
Issue area
Jail education and practical maintenance
How should jail service and maintenance follow-through be made visible?
2 questions
Issue area
Youth facilities, training and routine care
What should guide youth-facility improvements and routine safety checks?
2 questions
Browse by year
Report cycle archive
Official sources
All reports by year
Open a report overview for its summary, related civic questions, and official PDF.
2025–2026
View cycle2025–2026 report
Calipatria State Prison
The jury describes its October 2, 2025 inspection, educational and vocational programs, food service and medical operations. Three findings praise programming while identifying dining-area understaffing and an unstaffed gate. Four recommendations concern staffing, ice machines and reopening Charlie Yard. R3 is a fragment about ice machines in “Alpa Unit” and Delta Unit; it is preserved without inventing a repair or installation action. The report states no response is required because the prison is a state agency; this is the report’s position, not independent legal advice. This unchanged 33-page annual original contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 16–19, matching printed pages 16–19.
2025–2026 report
Centinela State Prison
The jury describes a November 6, 2025 inspection, rehabilitation programs, housing, education and medical services. Three findings combine favorable operational observations with concerns about dining-area staffing and gate coverage. Two recommendations call for increased dining staffing and continuous gate staffing, especially during peak hours. The report states no response is required because the prison is a state agency. No agency response is supplied; favorable inspection language does not independently establish comprehensive safety or long-term program outcomes. This unchanged annual original contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 20–23, matching printed pages 20–23.
2025–2026 report
Imperial County Jail
The jury describes an April 15, 2026 jail and Sheriff’s office visit, longer custody periods, medical services, education and work programs. Five findings address custody duration, cleanliness, staffing, fentanyl/Narcan and damaged medical-unit furniture. Two recommendations call for continued/expanded educational services and furniture replacement. The report names Imperial County Jail as required respondent only for R2; no current-cycle response is supplied, which does not establish nonresponse or lateness. Statements about overdose trends and recidivism remain attributed to the report and are not independently verified outcome data. This unchanged annual original contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 24–28, matching printed pages 24–28.
2025–2026 report
Imperial County Juvenile Hall
The jury describes a December 4, 2025 tour of Juvenile Hall and the adjacent Phoenix Project, education, gardening and youth services. Three findings and four recommendations address longer stays, facility upgrades, outdated bylaws, suicide-prevention/cognitive training and monthly vent cleaning. Broad praise for cleanliness coexists with the separate dirty-vent recommendation; neither statement is silently reconciled. The source names “Imperial Valley Juvenile Hall” as required respondent for R1 only. No response is supplied, not proof of nonresponse. This unchanged annual original contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 29–32, matching printed pages 29–32.