Response says
The Board partly disagrees, distinguishing informal public input from formally appointed committees with delegated responsibilities.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5
Engagement with the airport community
What should residents consider about Finding F5: Engagement with the airport community, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The partial position has a relevant rationale, but committee authority does not identify precisely which alleged engagement shortcoming is disputed or explain how airport engagement was meaningful. Named committee examples are assertions, not cited supporting records.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
3/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The partial position has a relevant rationale, but committee authority does not identify precisely which alleged engagement shortcoming is disputed or explain how airport engagement was meaningful. Named committee examples are assertions, not cited supporting records.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...