Response says
The Board partly disagrees, citing Policy F-10 section B.9, additional lease terms, and identical application requirements for existing and new users.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
Specific lease and application criteria
What should residents consider about Finding F3: Specific lease and application criteria, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies where criteria are located and gives a checkable policy provision. Its qualification that extra specificity belongs in leases explains the partial position while addressing extension, termination, and application rules.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies where criteria are located and gives a checkable policy provision. Its qualification that extra specificity belongs in leases explains the partial position while addressing extension, termination, and application rules.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...