Response says
The Board partly disagrees, describing collaborative lease revisions and a June 23, 2026 Policy F-10 update.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Policy and ground-lease alignment
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Policy and ground-lease alignment, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
A partial position and an explanation are explicit, with dated Board action and Legistar file 26-0740. The response explains later alignment but does not clearly identify which part of the earlier policy/practice discrepancy it accepts or disputes.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
A partial position and an explanation are explicit, with dated Board action and Legistar file 26-0740. The response explains later alignment but does not clearly identify which part of the earlier policy/practice discrepancy it accepts or disputes.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...