Response says
The Board agrees and identifies the Assessor’s Megabyte system and Planning and Building’s TRAKiT system as opportunities for improved data flow and communication.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4
Planning/Assessor information coordination
What should residents consider about Finding F4: Planning/Assessor information coordination, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Agreement covers the underused relationship and concrete system differences explain coordination opportunities. Named systems identify a checkable basis; integration benefits remain proposed, not verified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Agreement covers the underused relationship and concrete system differences explain coordination opportunities. Named systems identify a checkable basis; integration benefits remain proposed, not verified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...