Response says
The Board partly disagrees, acknowledging Sheriff-based linkages while citing a 2022 eight-county executive hierarchy review.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
Peer executive compensation benchmarks
What should residents consider about Finding F3: Peer executive compensation benchmarks, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response distinguishes accepted linkages from the disputed absence of peer-executive comparisons and identifies a dated comparison review. It explains the policy’s basis without independently validating market comparability.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response distinguishes accepted linkages from the disputed absence of peer-executive comparisons and identifies a dated comparison review. It explains the policy’s basis without independently validating market comparability.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...