Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, stating salary changes require public resolutions and staff reports with estimated cost and funding sources.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Automatic adjustments and fiscal testing
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Automatic adjustments and fiscal testing, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The public approval and annual costing process give specific reasons for disagreement, but ordinary cost estimates are not an explanation of revenue-scenario stress testing. The compound finding’s testing concern is incompletely covered. The Salary and Benefits Resolution is an identifiable basis.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The public approval and annual costing process give specific reasons for disagreement, but ordinary cost estimates are not an explanation of revenue-scenario stress testing. The compound finding’s testing concern is incompletely covered. The Salary and Benefits Resolution is an identifiable basis.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...