Response says
Partially disagrees, citing annual IOC review of prior activities and approval of the next audit plan.
What should residents consider about Finding BOS2602-F4: F4: The Internal Operation Committee’s (IOC) failure to exercise charter approval, audit plan pre-approval, and direct report receipt as required by IIA Standards 6.1, 6.2, 8.1, 9.4, 11.3 and Principle 8 leaves this organizational independence threat unmitigated, constituting an independence impairment in fact and appearance under GAGAS §3.56., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partially disagrees, citing annual IOC review of prior activities and approval of the next audit plan.
Audit analysis
Identifies plan approval as disputed and gives a concrete oversight account, but does not resolve charter approval, direct report receipt, or the distinction between impairment in fact and appearance.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
4/6
Public usefulness
Identifies plan approval as disputed and gives a concrete oversight account, but does not resolve charter approval, direct report receipt, or the distinction between impairment in fact and appearance.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.