Response says
Agrees with the finding without additional explanation.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding AC2602-F2
F2: The Internal Audit Division’s (IAD) Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 2.1, directs that it “follow applicable professional auditing standards in conducting our audits,” and defines which IIA or GAGAS standards are applicable to specific audit situations.
What should residents consider about Finding AC2602-F2: F2: The Internal Audit Division’s (IAD) Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 2.1, directs that it “follow applicable professional auditing standards in conducting our audits,” and defines which IIA or GAGAS standards are applicable to specific audit situations., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa County Auditor-ControllerAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit agreement engages F2; the response adds no finding-specific reasoning or independently checkable support. Agreement is not independent verification.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 0/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
Explicit agreement engages F2; the response adds no finding-specific reasoning or independently checkable support. Agreement is not independent verification.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...