Response says
Partially disagrees: no formal proactive input process exists, but Board and executives have supplied requests incorporated into annual plans.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding AC2602-F19
F19: IAD’s risk assessments do not include input from the Board or senior County executives, as required by IIA Standards 8.1 and 9.4.
What should residents consider about Finding AC2602-F19: F19: IAD’s risk assessments do not include input from the Board or senior County executives, as required by IIA Standards 8.1 and 9.4., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa County Auditor-ControllerAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Separates lack of formal process from asserted informal input; no particular request or annual plan is identified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
Separates lack of formal process from asserted informal input; no particular request or annual plan is identified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...