Response says
Disagrees but says attorneys are not notified by Sheriff and a long-standing court agreement provides for court notification.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding SHERIFF2605-F5
F5: If the participant is post-sentencing, the Notice of Disqualification is not sent to the last known attorney of record.
What should residents consider about Finding SHERIFF2605-F5: F5: If the participant is post-sentencing, the Notice of Disqualification is not sent to the last known attorney of record., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Sheriff-CoronerAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explains an alternative notification route, yet does not clearly identify a disputed portion of the finding that CAF does not send notice to the last attorney.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explains an alternative notification route, yet does not clearly identify a disputed portion of the finding that CAF does not send notice to the last attorney.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...