Response says
Partially disagrees while saying the form is being updated to cite Section 1203.017(g)(2) and will go to Board.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding SHERIFF2605-F2
F2: The Custody Alternative Facility (CAF) “Notice of Disqualification” does not cite Penal Code Section 1203.018(g)(2) (pre-trial EHD).
What should residents consider about Finding SHERIFF2605-F2: F2: The Custody Alternative Facility (CAF) “Notice of Disqualification” does not cite Penal Code Section 1203.018(g)(2) (pre-trial EHD)., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Sheriff-CoronerAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Formal F2 cites 1203.018(g)(2); response cites 1203.017(g)(2). Future revision does not explain which part of the present omission is disputed.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Formal F2 cites 1203.018(g)(2); response cites 1203.017(g)(2). Future revision does not explain which part of the present omission is disputed.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...