Response says
Agrees: most personnel and overhead costs are shared; separate program accounting would need new methods and time tracking.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding SHERIFF2605-F12
F12: The costs of the three CAF programs are never disaggregated; therefore, there is insufficient information to identify the cost of each separate program.
What should residents consider about Finding SHERIFF2605-F12: F12: The costs of the three CAF programs are never disaggregated; therefore, there is insufficient information to identify the cost of each separate program., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Sheriff-CoronerAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explains the disaggregation gap through finding-specific cost-allocation constraints, without identifying a cost study or dataset.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
Explains the disaggregation gap through finding-specific cost-allocation constraints, without identifying a cost study or dataset.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...