Response says
Partially disagrees: Chief Audit Executive rather than executive management approves; committee only reviews, so full conformity may still be lacking.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F28: F28: BART’s Internal Audit Charter and Audit Committee Charter both reflect that final approval authority over the Internal Audit Charter and annual audit plan rests with executive management rather than the Audit Committee, while IIA Standards 6.2 and 6.3 require that the governing body hold this approval authority., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partially disagrees: Chief Audit Executive rather than executive management approves; committee only reviews, so full conformity may still be lacking.
Audit analysis
Identifies disputed approver and conceded committee-authority gap using July 2025 charter. The response’s own description of charter assignment is internally awkward and not silently reconciled.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Identifies disputed approver and conceded committee-authority gap using July 2025 charter. The response’s own description of charter assignment is internally awkward and not silently reconciled.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.