Response says
Agrees with clarification: FY2025 $88.3m overtime includes $24.8m capital work and $63.5m operating costs.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BART2608-F22
F22: The FY2024 and FY2025 Quarterly Financial Reports did not identify overtime expenditure drivers by cause or category or establish a management target for overtime.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F22: F22: The FY2024 and FY2025 Quarterly Financial Reports did not identify overtime expenditure drivers by cause or category or establish a management target for overtime., and the County’s response?
BART Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explains reporting scope with named Quarterly Financial Report context; does not claim historical reports already supplied cause-based targets.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explains reporting scope with named Quarterly Financial Report context; does not claim historical reports already supplied cause-based targets.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...