Response says
Agrees with clarification: Board/GM did not negotiate union objections; OIG was asked to hold discussions, not negotiations.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2603-F8: F8: The Board has not itself attempted to negotiate with its unions a resolution to the unions’ objections to any of the OIG’s proposed charters., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Agrees with clarification: Board/GM did not negotiate union objections; OIG was asked to hold discussions, not negotiations.
Audit analysis
Addresses responsibility and distinguishes discussion from bargaining with concrete assertions but no identified supporting record here.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Addresses responsibility and distinguishes discussion from bargaining with concrete assertions but no identified supporting record here.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.