Response says
Partially disagrees while admitting no charter agenda item since August 2024; cites SB827 timing and April 16, 2026 cooperation/retaliation policy actions.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2603-F6: F6: Following its August 1, 2024, meeting that included on its agenda an “OIG Charter Discussion,” the Audit Committee has not placed on its agenda a discussion or review of an OIG charter., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partially disagrees while admitting no charter agenda item since August 2024; cites SB827 timing and April 16, 2026 cooperation/retaliation policy actions.
Audit analysis
Explains related policy actions but does not clearly identify what part of the no-charter-agenda proposition is disputed. Its January 1, 2026 SB827 assertion conflicts with the jury’s page 5 statement that the bill died; neither is externally resolved.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Explains related policy actions but does not clearly identify what part of the no-charter-agenda proposition is disputed. Its January 1, 2026 SB827 assertion conflicts with the jury’s page 5 statement that the bill died; neither is externally resolved.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.