Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BART2603-F16

F16: The Board has not issued a written policy or established written procedures stating that the OIG has the authority to determine adequacy of BART management’s actions taken in response to OIG audit and investigative recommendations.

What should residents consider about Finding BART2603-F16: F16: The Board has not issued a written policy or established written procedures stating that the OIG has the authority to determine adequacy of BART management’s actions taken in response to OIG audit and investigative recommendations., and the County’s response?

BART Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees with clarification: no separate Board policy, but cites District Act authority and May 2026 Status Update on Recommendations.

Audit analysis

Addresses the missing written policy without denying claimed existing statutory powers; identifies a checkable report.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Addresses the missing written policy without denying claimed existing statutory powers; identifies a checkable report.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is