Response says
Agrees with clarification: personal counsel sought GM concurrence; executive later supplied written answers; April 16, 2026 CFO statement recognized OIG authority.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BART2603-F12
F12: A BART executive has taken the position that the OIG cannot interview them unless their supervisor approves.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2603-F12: F12: A BART executive has taken the position that the OIG cannot interview them unless their supervisor approves., and the County’s response?
BART Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explains origin and subsequent scope of the objection with a dated committee statement.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explains origin and subsequent scope of the objection with a dated committee statement.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...