Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Waterfront resilience and contingency planning

What should Martinez’s contingency plan explain if the current waterfront development negotiations do not produce an agreement?

The jury recommends alternative funding alongside the ENA; City discusses other partnerships, reduced operations and retreat. No funded replacement program or confirmed February completion date is established.

Why this matters

Public access, core services and financing risk need to be considered together.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Martinez: Developing a Vibrant and Sustainable Waterfront

Report section
Finding F18 and recommendation R1
Source citation
Martinez: Developing a Vibrant and Sustainable Waterfront, Finding F18 and recommendation R1, physical PDF page 12
View referenced source