Response says
The County disagrees and repeats proposed implementation of General Plan measures.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F9
Track and schedule mineral-management objectives
What should residents consider about Finding F9: Track and schedule mineral-management objectives, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2025-08-12Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies the finding as disputed but offers future intentions rather than explaining existing tracking or schedules. The named measures on pages 8-9 are checkable, although they do not themselves establish tracking.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies the finding as disputed but offers future intentions rather than explaining existing tracking or schedules. The named measures on pages 8-9 are checkable, although they do not themselves establish tracking.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...