Response says
The County disagrees and says idle operators are working toward reclamation or closure after plan expiration.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F7
Expired interim management plans
What should residents consider about Finding F7: Expired interim management plans, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2025-08-12Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies its disagreement and offers an operational explanation, but does not explain how those efforts resolve the alleged noncompliance. It names no sites or records supporting the assertion.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
3/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The response identifies its disagreement and offers an operational explanation, but does not explain how those efforts resolve the alleged noncompliance. It names no sites or records supporting the assertion.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...