Response says
The County disagrees, citing approved historical site maps and operators’ annual acreage reports.
What should residents consider about Finding F4: Accuracy of disturbed-acreage reporting, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
The County disagrees, citing approved historical site maps and operators’ annual acreage reports.
Audit analysis
The response explains its reliance on previously approved maps and annual reports, but does not demonstrate verification of current disturbed acreage. It nevertheless addresses the uncertainty alleged with identifiable record types.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
The response explains its reliance on previously approved maps and annual reports, but does not demonstrate verification of current disturbed acreage. It nevertheless addresses the uncertainty alleged with identifiable record types.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.