Response says
The District gives no express finding position; its refusal of a new study implies that it considers existing reviews adequate.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
Cost effectiveness of vehicle leasing
What should residents consider about Finding F3: Cost effectiveness of vehicle leasing, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Water District Board of DirectorsResponse dated 2024-10-03Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The answer describes routine cost-versus-value review and Board updates, but does not clearly agree or disagree with the general finding or identify a specific comparison.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
2/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 1/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
3/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The answer describes routine cost-versus-value review and Board updates, but does not clearly agree or disagree with the general finding or identify a specific comparison.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...