Response says
The County partially disagrees, accepting that revisions would help while saying the existing website is beneficial.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Animal Services website usefulness
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Animal Services website usefulness, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2024-08-27Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The disputed scope is clear and a general reason is given, but the response identifies no particular existing feature or evidence for its usefulness.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
3/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
The disputed scope is clear and a general reason is given, but the response identifies no particular existing feature or evidence for its usefulness.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...