Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-6

Changes in programs

What should residents consider about Finding F26-6: Changes in programs, and the County’s response?

City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees without additional explanation.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement covers the historical-program finding; no program record or rationale is supplied.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

Explicit agreement covers the historical-program finding; no program record or rationale is supplied.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is