Response says
Partially disagrees while saying the finding is generally believed true; describes a Crankstart-supported study of larger containers at no additional cost.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-4
Container prices and dumping
What should residents consider about Finding F26-4: Container prices and dumping, and the County’s response?
City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit partial disagreement does not identify the disputed proposition or explain why it is rejected; the named study supplies a checkable basis for the proposed evaluation.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explicit partial disagreement does not identify the disputed proposition or explain why it is rejected; the named study supplies a checkable basis for the proposed evaluation.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...