Response says
Partially disagrees, identifying the Public Works Director as lead for most efforts, the City Administrator as overall manager and supporting Mayor/Project Manager roles.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-24
Single coordinating official
What should residents consider about Finding F26-24: Single coordinating official, and the County’s response?
City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explains the disagreement through specific assigned roles, but identifies no appointment, charter section or other supporting record in this finding entry.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
Explains the disagreement through specific assigned roles, but identifies no appointment, charter section or other supporting record in this finding entry.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...