Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-22

Work-order training

What should residents consider about Finding F26-22: Work-order training, and the County’s response?

City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees and describes added training, procedures, technology and staff time for proper closure.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement covers the finding; operational assertions have no named training record, date or curriculum in this entry.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
1/2
Support traceability
1/2

Explicit agreement covers the finding; operational assertions have no named training record, date or curriculum in this entry.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is