Response says
Agrees that OAK311 takes requests; distinguishes this from a comprehensive waste inventory and says funded aerial imagery will add tracking capabilities.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-20
OAK311 reporting
What should residents consider about Finding F26-20: OAK311 reporting, and the County’s response?
City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit agreement with concrete system limits and the named OAK311 system as a checkable basis.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explicit agreement with concrete system limits and the named OAK311 system as a checkable basis.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...