Response says
Agrees with the historical finding; says OPW now refers cases to OPD and is expanding coordination with the County and District Attorney, with a linked funding news report.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F26-14
Criminal prosecution referrals
What should residents consider about Finding F26-14: Criminal prosecution referrals, and the County’s response?
City of Oakland City Administration and City CouncilResponse dated 2026-07-31Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit agreement with a concrete referral pathway and identified supporting coverage; current District Attorney prosecutions are not claimed as established.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explicit agreement with a concrete referral pathway and identified supporting coverage; current District Attorney prosecutions are not claimed as established.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...