Response says
Defends purchasing controls, listing the EFS Authority Type field, approvals, thresholds, purchase orders and waiver process.
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Current purchasing and contract controls are insufficient to confirm that the approved purchasing process is followed. Without appropriate oversight of the purchasing process, there is undue financial and operational risk to Sonoma County., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Defends purchasing controls, listing the EFS Authority Type field, approvals, thresholds, purchase orders and waiver process.
Audit analysis
Identifies the disputed controls conclusion and explains concrete mechanisms, including an identified financial system and field. Their effectiveness is not independently verified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Identifies the disputed controls conclusion and explains concrete mechanisms, including an identified financial system and field. Their effectiveness is not independently verified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.