Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4

The Sonoma County CDRT lacks leadership. Without formal leadership the CDRT has failed to meet statutory requirements.

What should residents consider about Finding F4: The Sonoma County CDRT lacks leadership. Without formal leadership the CDRT has failed to meet statutory requirements., and the County’s response?

Sonoma County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Describes shared leadership by Health Services and the District Attorney, with differing agency duties; the response continues on page 4.

Audit analysis

Disputes absence of leadership with named co-leading departments and a multidisciplinary explanation; continuation acknowledges reporting-capacity needs without identifying a governance instrument or case-review record.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

Disputes absence of leadership with named co-leading departments and a multidisciplinary explanation; continuation acknowledges reporting-capacity needs without identifying a governance instrument or case-review record.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is