The jury questions the rationale and efficacy of reviewing a case after four evaluated-out referrals within twelve months. This discussion asks what protected analysis and public explanation could support evaluation; it does not presume a different threshold would be safer.
Why this matters
Screening policies need meaningful evaluation without exposing individual families.
Public participation
Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.
Supporting evidence
This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.
Supporting report