Response says
Disagrees with the asserted duty, missing-contact characterization, personnel terminology and alleged lack of currency.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Lack of up-to-date required information could lead to the public’s inability to contact Reclamation District personnel.
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Lack of up-to-date required information could lead to the public’s inability to contact Reclamation District personnel., and the County’s response?
Solano Local Agency Formation CommissionResponse dated 2026-09-11Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The four disputed components are specifically explained through directory locations, statutes, district responsibilities and described outreach. The audit does not resolve the competing interpretation.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The four disputed components are specifically explained through directory locations, statutes, district responsibilities and described outreach. The audit does not resolve the competing interpretation.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...