Response says
Disagrees that citation counts alone adequately measure deterrence or enforcement.
What should residents consider about Finding F6: Considering the size of the problem and the need to issue citations as a means of deterrent, the small number of citations issued in 2025 appears to be disproportionate to the reported use of illegal fireworks., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Disagrees that citation counts alone adequately measure deterrence or enforcement.
Audit analysis
The Board identifies seizures, contacts, investigations, duplicate calls, evidentiary thresholds and dated operations described under F1. This gives finding-specific reasons for rejecting the proposed comparison; reported activity trends remain agency claims.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
The Board identifies seizures, contacts, investigations, duplicate calls, evidentiary thresholds and dated operations described under F1. This gives finding-specific reasons for rejecting the proposed comparison; reported activity trends remain agency claims.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.