Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F7

Sunnyslope accepted an outside rate study that did not include methodology templates from the contractor, which hindered their ability to fully analyze the recommendations within the report.

What should residents consider about Finding F7: Sunnyslope accepted an outside rate study that did not include methodology templates from the contractor, which hindered their ability to fully analyze the recommendations within the report., and the County’s response?

Sunnyslope County Water District Board of DirectorsResponse dated 2026-09-04Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Wholly disagrees, claiming the consultant provided methodology and the model predicts finances accurately.

Audit analysis

The response explains its position using the rate model, three years of budget comparisons and a model term through 2028. It does not specifically produce or distinguish the methodology templates sought by the finding. General model performance is not proof template access was adequate.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The response explains its position using the rate model, three years of budget comparisons and a model term through 2028. It does not specifically produce or distinguish the methodology templates sought by the finding. General model performance is not proof template access was adequate.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is