Response says
Wholly disagrees, claiming the consultant provided methodology and the model predicts finances accurately.
What should residents consider about Finding F7: Sunnyslope accepted an outside rate study that did not include methodology templates from the contractor, which hindered their ability to fully analyze the recommendations within the report., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Wholly disagrees, claiming the consultant provided methodology and the model predicts finances accurately.
Audit analysis
The response explains its position using the rate model, three years of budget comparisons and a model term through 2028. It does not specifically produce or distinguish the methodology templates sought by the finding. General model performance is not proof template access was adequate.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
4/6
Public usefulness
The response explains its position using the rate model, three years of budget comparisons and a model term through 2028. It does not specifically produce or distinguish the methodology templates sought by the finding. General model performance is not proof template access was adequate.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.